Siera Alliance

Recycling ban for mineral waste with intentionally added asbestos

Blog post ()

In the field of environmental engineering, the professional handling of mineral waste is becoming increasingly important – especially when asbestos is involved. Regulatory specifications, technical limits and occupational health and safety requirements place high demands on planning, dismantling and disposal.

Against this background, this article deals with the Recycling ban for mineral waste with intentionally added asbestos. The categorisation is carried out from an environmental and legal perspective and is particularly relevant for infrastructure, transport and civil engineering structures. The technical classification takes place, among other things, in the context of the environmental expertise of BIG – Member of the SIERA Alliance.

Technical background: Asbestos in mineral building materials

Differentiation between natural and intentionally added asbestos

The highly stressed road surface layers in particular often incorporate basic, magmatic rocks such as basalt, diabase or gabbro, which can contain natural proportions of asbestos minerals. In the 1960s and 1970s in particular, asbestos fibres were also intentionally added (e.g. in joint sealants for concrete road surfaces or as asbestos-containing spacers in bridge structures).

Legal framework: Chemicals, hazardous substances and waste legislation

Prohibitions according to ChemVerbotsV and REACH

According to Section 3 (1) of the Chemicals Prohibition Ordinance (ChemVerbotsV) in conjunction with Annex XVII of Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation), the manufacture, placing on the market and use of asbestos fibres and of articles and mixtures to which these fibres are intentionally added is prohibited. This ban does not apply to naturally occurring mineral raw materials and preparations and articles made from them that contain asbestos with a mass content < 0.1 %.

Delimitation according to the Hazardous Substances Ordinance

According to Section 16 (2) in conjunction with Annex 2 No. 1 (asbestos) of the Hazardous Substances Ordinance, the extraction, processing, further processing and reuse of naturally occurring mineral raw materials and preparations and products made from them that contain asbestos is only prohibited with a mass content of 0.1 % or more.

Classification according to TRGS 517 and waste legislation

Limit values and declaration

According to the specifications of TRGS 517, layers with a proportion of respirable asbestos fibres according to WHO < 0.008 M.-% must be declared „asbestos-free“. „Special measures“ for occupational health and safety are not required. With an asbestos content WHO ≥ 0.008 M.-%, the layers must be declared as „asbestos-containing“, but are classified as „non-hazardous waste“ up to the limit of 0.1 M-%.

According to the Hazardous Substances Ordinance, mixtures and products with an asbestos content of less than 0.1 M.-% may be reused. Irrespective of this, „special measures“ for occupational health and safety are required for the removal of layers containing asbestos.

From a mass content of ≥ 0.1 M.-%, it is waste that may no longer be placed on the market and must be disposed of as hazardous waste.

Measurement results and evaluation

No rounding of analysis values

Please note when specifying the results: Values are not rounded, i.e. a result of e.g. 0.099 M.-% is not rounded up to 0.1 M.-%. This means that the value is below the value of 0.1 M.-% and is therefore categorised as „non-hazardous waste“.

Special feature: Intentionally added asbestos

Exclusion from the circular economy

There are no exemptions from restriction regulations for intentionally added asbestos. As soon as asbestos is detected, it must be removed from the circular economy in accordance with the ChemVerbV in conjunction with the REACH Regulation, regardless of its mass content.

Demolition, separation and mass observation

Unaltered original text:

If it turns out that asbestos products have been used, it must be checked with regard to the KrWG whether these products can be separated from the rest of the building. If this is not the case, a mass analysis is required, i.e. the mass of asbestos must be converted to the mass of the building.

Possible constellations for disposal

➢ If the mass fraction is less than 0.1 M.-%, the demolition waste must be disposed of as non-hazardous waste with the waste code 17 01 01 concrete with the addition „contains asbestos“ at a landfill authorised for this purpose.

With a mass fraction of ≥ 0.1 M.-%, the demolition material must be disposed of as hazardous waste with the waste code 17 06 05* Asbestos-containing building materials at a landfill authorised for this purpose.

It is not permissible to extrapolate the asbestos content to the total demolition material in order to make the declaration „asbestos-free“. If spacers containing asbestos are present, the entire demolition material must be categorised as „containing asbestos“.

Significance for practice in the environmental and engineering sector

For engineering and environmental projects – especially in transport and infrastructure construction – the Correct classification of asbestos content crucial for planning security, occupational safety and legally compliant disposal. Specialist expertise, such as that provided by BIG- Member of the SIERA Alliance The Environmental Technology division supports clients in the legally compliant implementation of complex requirements.

👉 Are you planning demolition, renovation or infrastructure measures with mineral waste?
The experts from BIG- Mimember of the SIERA Alliance support you with sound environmental advice and practical solutions – all in the spirit of Engineering For a Better Tomorrow.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Other Blogs

JOIN OUR FREE WEBINARS FOR VALUABLE INSIGHTS FROM OUR ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS

A Message from the Founder: Florian von Tucher

In the mid-2000s my involvement in development aid took me to some of the most remote and impoverished regions of the world. 

Northern Tibet, Mongolia, and Western China – where I was involved with the implementation of decentralised wastewater treatment systems, I realised I needed a deeper purpose. Though I later found success in real estate development, the desire to make a lasting impact never left me.  

A pivotal moment occurred when I was invited to Ghana by my friend and mentor, Cardinal Peter Turkson, who was the head of the Dicastery for the Promotion of Integral Human Development of the Catholic Church at the time. He has since been appointed the Pontifical Chancellor of the Academy of Sciences and the Pontifical Chancellor of Social Sciences.  

Cardinal Turkson had a profound influence on me. His invitation gave me the opportunity to witness firsthand the development needs of the country. We reflected on my experiences in China, and together, we envisioned a model of development that would take root in one community and gradually expand. We believed that small, strategic steps could lead to lasting transformation – just like the biblical parable of the mustard seed, which grows into something far greater than its humble beginnings. 

Cardinal Turkson’s steadfast belief in this vision and encouragement became the base upon which the Mustard Seed Foundation was built. His unwavering support, wisdom, and guidance helped shape not just the mission of the Foundation, but my personal journey as well. 

With the encouragement of the Cardinal and the Integral Human Development (IHD) office, we initially operated with the IHD before establishing the Mustard Seed Foundation as a stand-alone organisation in Germany. We have been fortunate to receive support from numerous European donors, a humble reminder that our mission is not just about individual efforts – it is about collective impact. 

Collaboration has been a cornerstone of our work. We have partnered with organisations like Caritas and Rotary International to extend our reach. One of our most impactful collaborations has been with M&P Group, who donate their engineering concepts, project supervision, and high-quality technical execution, allowing 100% of donor contributions to go into the projects themselves. 

One such initiative is the Clean Water Initiative, launched in partnership with M&P Group. In 2024, we completed a well in Ndoss, Senegal, significantly improving agricultural efficiency and empowering the local community. This project epitomises our commitment to sustainable solutions – starting with clean water and gradually building infrastructure that supports long-term development. 

Our work aligns closely with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), focusing on poverty alleviation, economic empowerment, environmental sustainability, and humanitarian aid. Our model is simple but effective: start with one project and expand, year by year, to create an ecosystem of support. A water well leads to a school, which leads to renewable energy solutions, which, in turn, fosters economic opportunities. Over time, these efforts cumulatively transform entire regions. 

The Mustard Seed Foundation is a testament to what can be achieved with nothing more than a vision, a strong commitment, and the faith of a mustard seed. Yet, none of this would have been possible without the belief and encouragement of Cardinal Peter Turkson. His unwavering faith in our mission gave me the courage to persevere through challenges and continue expanding our impact. As we continue our work, we remain driven by the belief that small beginnings can yield great outcomes, inspiring hope and lasting change in the communities we serve. His legacy of faith, vision, and commitment to human dignity is deeply woven into every initiative we undertake.